University of Manchester
University of Pennsylvania
“In Chicago, the belief that the police hate Black people and mistreat them, brutalize them, torture the and kill them is so commonplace as to be banal” (Ralph 2020, 186)
“(…) Chicago’s South Side neighborhoods were under siege. The police broke down doors, pointed guns at parents and children, and assaulted suspects” (Hagan, McCarthy, and Herda 2022, 11)

“In 2014, Chicago police stopped, questioned, and often frisked more than 718,000 people. That was a big number for a city of 2.7 million. It was more than three times the stop rate in the place best known for its aggressive stop & frisk policy, New York City” (Skogan 2022, 1)
“(…) during its peak year of 2014, 90 percent of those stopped were African Americans and Hispanics. From 2013 to 2015 more police enforcement actions were taken in Chicago’s predominately African American neighborhoods than there were people living there, every year” (Skogan 2022, 2)
\(\leadsto\) …for the neighborhood concentration of police use-of-force?
\(\leadsto\) …for people living in such over-policed neighborhoods?
Neighborhood-level data (\(N=865\) census tracts)
\(\leadsto\) Police-related variables
\(\leadsto\) Social disorganization antecedents (US Census 2010)
Does stop & frisk concentrate where crime and social disorganization antecedents concentrate?
Does police use-of-force concentrate where stop & frisk concentrates?
\(\leadsto\) Spatial regression models (SLX) with logged outcomes1
Spatial regression models (SLX) controlling for residential stability, immigrant concentration, population density, and spatial dependence. \(N=865\).
Spatial regression models (SLX) controlling for concentrated disadvantage, residential stability, immigrant concentration, population density, and spatial dependence. \(N=865\).
Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN)
287 out of those 682 PHDCN+ respondents were living in Chicago from 2012 to 2015, the era of stop & frisk (Skogan 2022)
Independent variable: Cumulative neighborhood exposure to police use-of-force (2012–2015)
We define \(D_{ijt}\) where \(T \in \{1, 2, 3, 4\}\) as the number of tactical response reports in neighborhood \(j\) where respondent \(i\) was residing during period \(t\). Periods here refer to years 2012 (\(t=1\)) through 2015 (\(t=5\)). We then define cumulative neighborhood exposure to police use-of-force as \(cum(D_{i})= \sum_{t=1}^{4}d_{ijt}\), i.e., the sum of all TRRs per individual across this four-year period
Dependent variables: Police victimization (measured in 2021)
In your whole life, has a police officer ever used a weapon against you, such as a gun, Taser, stun gun, baton, nightstick, or pepper spray?
In your whole life, have you ever been searched, verbally abused, or physically threatened by a police officer?
Did you know anyone who was killed by a police officer?
Neighborhood exposure to violent crime is a time-varying confounder, as police use-of-force and violent crime are dynamically related. Weights created using residual balancing permits appropriatelly controlling for time-varying confounders without introducing over-control bias.
Other (pre-exposure) controls:
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) survey instrument was a parent-report questionnaire on which the child was rated on various behavioral and emotional problems.
\(\leadsto\) Effects disaggregated by ethnicity: White, Black, Latino
Probability of police victimization
Marginal structural models estimated as Firth’s penalized linear probability models with weights created using residual balancing to control for dynamic exposure to neighborhood violence and robust Huber-White standard errors. \(N=257\).
In Chicago, aggressive policing tactics were widely used between 2012 and 2015 – the stop & frisk era (Skogan 2022)
“Confrontational proactive policing methods may have social benefits in crime reduction but costs inintrusion on the rights and privacy of innocent persons” (Manski and Nagin 2017, 9308)
Over-policed neighborhoods are more likely to have more incidents of police use-of-force
Black and Latino individuals residing in neighborhoods where police use-of-force concentrates are more likely to experience police victimization
\(\leadsto\) White residents are not
“(…) there are thee Chicagos, not one. The city’s large White, African American, and Hispanic neighborhoods differ dramatically in character, including their distinctive crime problems and their relationship with the police. In important ways residents live in different worlds” (Skogan 2022, 18)